[ Message Board · Trouble with Comics · Reviews · Essays · Interviews · Audio Interviews · Facebook · writeblog · A Criminal Blog · Kochalkaholic · FAQ · E-Mail ]

Monday, July 21, 2008

 
Hello, America.The Dark Nihilist -- The new Batman movie The Dark Knight works on a number of levels -- as a superhero movie, it makes almost all that came before, from Superman to X-Men and everything else, including its own predecessor, Batman Begins, seem hopelessly juvenile. As filmed adventure/fantasy fiction, it is as compelling and ambitious as some of the better superhero(y) movies of the past few decades, including The Matrix and Dark City.

Unlike most cape-based films, it works as a movie, with an epic scope and fantastic sequences firmly, even boldly grounded by its attention to character and genuinely first-rate acting by Morgan Freeman, Christian Bale, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Aaron Eckhart and especially, the very heart of the movie, Heath Ledger as the first, full-on believable Joker, a thing never before seen on film, and rarely seen in the comics. You want to spend time with this Joker the way you wanted to spend time with Hannibal in The Silence of the Lambs or Dexter on Dexter, or Vic Mackey on The Shield. They're mad, they're murderous, they're the life of the party with lampshade-on-head and razor blade in hand.

And because of Ledger's fully-committed, fearless willingness to explore the both the depths of nihilism and the heights of anarchy, the movie works as a nuanced and powerful commentary on the state of our world right now. Make no mistake about it, Ledger's Joker is both living terror and living terrorism, the manic, horrific spirit of the 9/11 bombers skull-fucking Hannibal Lecter in hell after their 72 virgins failed to show up as expected. The Dark Knight's Joker may very well have infected Ledger's soul and driven him to an early end; as "The War on Terror" has shown America the gaping hole at the center of its vapid, self-destructive militaristic-consumerist ideals, so too does Ledger's cheap, terrible and unknowable clown drive his enemies -- Batman and all of Gotham's would-be knights, from Jim Gordon and the tragic Harvey Dent to the very everyman on the street (in a marvelously constructed sequence involving game theory set on two boats, one filled with "good people," the other filled with hardcore criminals) to the very edge of their own personal ethics and beyond. "Any Gotham resident who sacrifices freedom for personal safety," it might be said "deserves The Joker."

Yes, more than anything, The Dark Knight speaks directly, violently to our post-9/11 world of paranoia and sacrificed liberties. Morgan Freeman's Lucius Fox is every compromised American as he lets Bruce Wayne convince him to invade the privacy of literally every citizen in Gotham in his fevered zeal to bring down his enemy. Sure, Bruce Wayne means well when he abuses and misuses the technology at his disposal to battle the terror that is waging war against him; the Bush administration claims it means well, too, when it engages in illegal wiretaps and surveillance of a compliant and complicit populace. Batman means well when he tortures The Joker for information; he's trying to save the love of his life, freedom and the safety of us all. See also Jack Bauer. See also, America. What's left of it.

Heath Ledger goes dark like Chris Carter's Millennium or Trent Reznor's The Downward Spiral went dark. Down deep, shuffling and giggling and picking scabs and demanding all in his quest for nothing, for nihilism, for lost hope and bad jokes and shaggy dog stories by way of Dog Day Afternoon; call it Shaggy Dog Day Afternoon and there you have The Dark Knight. Watch it and you'll see what I mean.

The movie is about heroism like Bush's war is about righteousness; the fact is, both are about arrogance and mindless violence pretending to be about greed and torture and terror. Ultimately The Dark Knight is only about the black, empty hole inside Heath Ledger's Joker like The War on Terror is only about the black, empty hole inside George W. Bush and his fellow war criminals. And that is why the movie, and the war, fail on an epic level.

Both are filled with murder and mayhem and good guys and bad guys and supposed good guys who act bad and very, very bad guys who suppose they are good. The failure of Bush's war is obvious and needs no explanation; it has literally destroyed the US and Iraq and thus is a perfect storm of nihilism disguised as imperialistic idealism. The movie's failure is less distinct and comes, actually, very late in the proceedings. At the exact moment Batman leaves The Joker hanging instead of cutting his throat and letting him die, the movie betrays itself and its own dedication to exploring the darkest holes we all contain. The Silence of the Lambs was an artistic success because Hannibal not only got away at the end, but got away and obviously was going to eat his own nemesis, Dr. Chilton, for dinner. Think back to the glee you took as the camera pulled back to show Chilton being followed into a crowd by Hannibal, breezy and as determined as a lion stalking his prey, his bloody, frenzied victory never in doubt.

No wonder Ledger couldn't live with what he had created; obviously neither could Warner Bros., Christopher Nolan or the people who go to see this movie. The truth of it is too much to live with, and so Batman lets the Joker live and it all falls apart. It's a marvelous, invigorating ride to the very end, but in failing to succumb to the fact that all we've seen leads only to one, dead-end conclusion and yet does not, the movie ultimately falls flat and fails to embrace its own themes and fails to answer truthfully the questions it asks. The prisoners on one boat and the innocent on the other prove the value of humanity in their final choices, and the end of The Dark Knight by all rights and very obviously should have proved and justified the death wish of Ledger's Joker by allowing Batman to take his revenge and murder the clown; it would have been fitting revenge for the death of Rachel Dawes; it would have guaranteed a safer Gotham City; it would have shown Batman his true face and his true purpose. The Joker would have found it the funniest joke of all, but because Nolan and Batman fuck up the punchline, The Dark Knight fails to be the pinnacle of art being true to itself and its own inner logic.

It's a wild and imminently watchable ride. I just wish it had the courage of its convictions.

Labels: ,


3 Comments:

Blogger Comics007 said...

RE: The Joker would have found it the funniest joke of all, but because Nolan and Batman fuck up the punchline, The Dark Knight fails to be the pinnacle of art being true to itself and its own inner logic. It's a wild and imminently watchable ride. I just wish it had the courage of its convictions.

Eh, I don't think it was a question of courage. There were plenty of cops around, witnesses that would have seen Batman commit murder. Batman sparing Joker's life allowed him to track down Two-Face in time to save Gordon's son. He needed information. Killing the Joker after obtaining the info was an option, but it did not fit the narrative's sense of urgency. He got the information he needed and immediately acted on it which was both responsible and true to his character.

Remember earlier in the film when he stopped Harvey from killing one of the corrupt cops? Gotham needed a symbol of hope, not another hypocritical murderer. In Batman Begins there is a great deal of planning that Bruce put in to his alter ego, about what he would represent. Nolan was wise to remain consistent and the result was a stronger film that didn't take the easy way out by allowing the obvious political metaphor to dictate what happened next.

22 July, 2008 00:47  
Blogger d. emerson eddy said...

Hola,

It is late and I don't have a lot of time to go into detail, but look at The Dark Knight through an existentialist lens. Nolan's essentially painting Batman as going through his own "fear and trembling" -- or to use a terrible spin on the title "dark night of the soul". If Batman were to kill the Joker, he ultimately would have failed. He would be a tragic hero, yes, and we would greatly understand his rage and anger -- justified as it were -- in murder, but that's all he would be. Instead, by choosing to let the Joker live, choosing to rescue Gordon and his family, and then choosing to be hated and hunted -- as are many things that people don't understand -- he accepts the paradox and transcends simple heroism.

23 July, 2008 02:28  
Blogger David Wynne said...

Hey Alan.

I finally saw the film yeterday, so I only read this today... I agree with some of what you say here, but I don't think the film was specifically meant to be an allegory for the current US political situation. I think there are parallels, and I think they're deliberate (I certainly don't think it's a coincidence that Harvey Dent refers to the Joker as a terrorist), but I also think they're just icing on the cake.

Remember, this is actually (despite where the money comes from) a British film. I might be wrong, but I don't think Christopher Nolan is necaessarily going to make a movie that is so tightly focused on the politics of another country... especially when there are so many people from that country who are doing that already.

Personally, I took the film as a kind of wildly interpretive adaptation of The Killing Joke. It's all about the clash between Batman and The Joker's fundamentally opposed worldviews- The Joker thinks that people are inately amoral and generally bad (like him) and it's only society that makes them do good things- while Batman believes (or at least represents the belief) that the exact opposite is true. Ultimately, as with Gordon's failure to succumb to madness in TKJ, the refusal of the ferry passengers to kill each other proves Batman right. At that point, there's no reason for Batman to kill the Joker- he's already won the argument.

Anyway, who really cares... that bit with the truck was fucking AWESOME

31 July, 2008 23:51  

Post a Comment

<< Home

---

---

---

FEATURED RESOURCES

Banks are regarded the best option for making a safe investments as well as having world wide accepted creditcard. People are not only facilitated by loans but also provided debt management consolidation by the leading banks. Students can also get loans as well as apply for student loan consolidation. At the same time high flying insurance companies also contribute to the any one’s life through offering different plans of life, health and dental insurance. Along insurance of life one can also enhance its home security through installing latest home security systems.


This page is powered by ADD.